There was a time when the internet had an address inside your house. PO Box The Computer Room, or a quiet corner. It was a desk, a chair and a machine that screamed for 30 seconds before it let you in. You logged on, and then crucially, you logged off.
It didn't follow you to the dinner table.
It didn't come to the park.
It didn't sit in your pocket waiting for a quiet moment to fill.
When you left the house, it stayed behind.
I keep coming back to that time because I think it explains almost everything about where culture is heading right now.
For more than a decade, brands have sold us the future. Everything was smarter, faster, newer, better. Innovation was the promise and the price of entry - a church on high where people came to worship. And at the helm was Apple - the high priest of it all. With every year came another keynote - another thinner, cleverer rectangle, another reason to want what was next.
We believed it.
We queued for it.
And then something shifted.
The future arrived and it turned out to be expensive, automated, uncertain and, to be honest, a little frightening.
So we stopped reaching forward - and we started reaching back.
We’re not craving what's new anymore.
We're craving what feels safe.
The evidence is everywhere - and it's selling
You can see it in the wardrobes first, because fashion always tells us before anyone else does. 90s sportswear is back. Stretchy chokers, bubble wedges, baggy jeans, claw clips, velour. Brands long left for dead have been pulled back into the conversation. (Juicy Couture was not on my bingo card for this year, but here we are.)
But this resurgence isn’t just a fashion cycle, and that's the part people are missing.
Analog is back and bigger than ever. In 2025, US vinyl sales passed a billion dollars for the first time since the 1980s. Cassette sales, of all things, climbed 200% and brands like We Are Rewind and Sony reintroduced cassette players with Bluetooth bolted on. Film cameras, Polaroids, dumb phones, brick Nokias - all of it moving, all of it bought by people young enough to have never owned the originals.
Then there's the retreat from the screen itself. A 2025 Deloitte survey of more than 4,000 Brits found that almost a quarter had deleted a social media app in the previous year, rising to nearly a third of Gen Z. Unplugged, the UK's digital detox cabin company, went from a handful of locations in 2020 to more than fifty by 2026. People are paying money to be handed a paper map and a brick phone and be left alone in a field. People are craving time offline.
None of this is nostalgia in the soft, sentimental sense. It's a market.
And markets are just emotion with a receipt attached.
The generation that wants a past it never had
And here’s the kicker.
The people leading the charge are the ones who never lived it.
Gen Z, the most chronically online generation in history, the ones born into the feed and raised by the algorithm, are the ones aching hardest for a time before any of it.
They're burnt out on the devices they were handed before they could spell, and they're reaching for an exit that leads somewhere they've never actually been.
They aren't remembering the 90s.
They're grieving a version of the present they’ll never get to live.
There's a Welsh word for the feeling: hiraeth. A longing for a place you can't return to, or that maybe never existed quite the way you remember it. The writer John Koenig coined a companion term for the rest of it, anemoia: nostalgia for a time you never knew. Put them together and you have the exact emotional weather of this moment.
And the irony, the thing I can't stop thinking about, is that AI is doing a lot of the longing for us. Accounts with millions of views and followers now generate synthetic nineties on demand - 90skid4lyfe, I’m looking at you. Think 90s Christmases remade, a walk down a local high street 1997, a teenager's bedroom, curtains drawn, portable TV glowing. None of it real, but all of it felt. Pizza Hut leaned all the way in and rebuilt its old dine in restaurants so people could physically sit inside the memory.
We’re using the most advanced technology ever made to manufacture the feeling of a world that had almost none of it.
That tension is the whole story.
Why the 90s, and why now?
I feel lucky to have grown up in the 90s. I always felt it was a special time. It felt simpler, more vibrant, more fun. Life felt smaller - in a good way - and we enjoyed the freedom that came with that. Calling for your friends, skating in the street, making dens, roaming around. Days stretched endlessly and everything felt possible.
But the thing I keep landing on is this: we got to make mistakes without them being recorded.
That sounds small. But it isn't.
A huge part of the weight Gen Z carries is that anything they say or do can be on a platform, in front of strangers, in seconds, forever. We never had to grow up under that. I can't imagine what it must be like to go through an awkward, clumsy, necessary phase with a permanent record running. To be that online, that young, in a world that already feels unsafe.
So when these generations reach for the 90s, they're reaching for the one thing the era genuinely offered that ours doesn't: the right to be unobserved. To be shaped by the people you hung around with, the places you went, the music you actually chose, instead of by a system optimising your taste back at you.
Culture used to come from your corner of the world.
Now it comes from a recommendation engine.
And this is what's being mourned. Not the fashion - the freedom underneath it.
The brands that understood the assignment
Plenty of brands see a trend, copy the surface, slap a grainy filter on a logo and call it a throwback. But the real winners don’t copy the past, they translate for today.
Two that got it right.
Adidas Backyard Legends. An old school, playground feeling football ad in the era of Messi and Beckham that took you straight back to how football culture used to feel before it was content. Mud, mates, a ball, no audience. It didn't reference the 90s at all, it just reconstructed the feeling of the era.
Sporty & Rich x Juicy Couture. I never thought I'd defend the return of the velour tracksuit, yet here we are. They didn't photocopy 2003. They softened it, made it more wellness than shopping centre and shifted it to feel more considered. It's a version of the past built for the present, which is the only version that ever really works.
That's the rule, if there is one.
You don't sell people the past.
You sell them the feeling the past gave them, rebuilt for the life they're living today.
The question underneath every revival
Whenever a trend comes back, the interesting question is never what's returning, it's what's missing?
Why this, why now, what hole is it filling?
What does its return tell you about how people feel about the present they're standing in?
For the 90s, the answer is uncomfortable but simple.
The return is an admission. It's people quietly conceding that the world we live in today feels unstable, unsafe and fragile, and that the future they were sold hasn't made them feel any of the things it promised. So they're looking backwards, because the past is the one place that still feels familiar, and familiar, right now, feels a lot like safety.
The internet used to live in a box, and we got to decide when to open it.
I think what everyone's really nostalgic for isn't the decade at all.
It's the off switch.
This one's on us.
OOB is a social media agency. If this sparked something, let's talk.

